<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkof.com/2007/09/26/mahmoud-ahmadinejad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkof.com/2007/09/26/mahmoud-ahmadinejad/</link>
	<description>Got Something To Say?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.talkof.com/2007/09/26/mahmoud-ahmadinejad/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkof.com/2007/09/26/mahmoud-ahmadinejad/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Sure, everyone can agree that freedom of speech is a good thing. It&#039;s great! But when people think that they&#039;re being forced to extend this right to dictators with well documented pasts of committing crimes against humanity, their feelings can quickly change.

The college president, Lee Bollinger prefaced Ahmadinejad by saying, &quot;It should never be thought that merely to listen to ideas we deplore in any way implies our endorsement of those ideas, or the weakness of our resolve to resist those ideas or our naiveté about the very real dangers inherent in such ideas. It is a critical premise of freedom of speech that we do not honor the dishonorable when we open the public forum to their voices.&quot; He also cited the quotable expression about how free speech is &quot;an experiment, as all life is an experiment.&quot; and apologized in advance for any suffering that giving this speaker a public forum would cause.

Before turning to Ahmadinejad he finished   on the subject, &quot;In the moment, the arguments for free speech will never seem to match the power of the arguments against, but what we must remember is that this is precisely because free speech asks us to exercise extraordinary self-restraint against the very natural but often counterproductive impulses that lead us to retreat from engagement with ideas we dislike and fear. In this lies the genius of the American idea of free speech.&quot; Bollinger furthered the introduction by condemning the government of Iran for unjust imprisonment, public executions, and other violations of human rights.

I think that the subject of free speech can transcend politics. I think that debate in all forms is usually a good thing and I really think that Columbia&#039;s prez eloquently expressed this--His thoughts on freedom of speech were the best I&#039;ve ever heard in my life.
&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://ecology666.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;The Bliggity No Diggity Blog-a-Log &lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, everyone can agree that freedom of speech is a good thing. It&#8217;s great! But when people think that they&#8217;re being forced to extend this right to dictators with well documented pasts of committing crimes against humanity, their feelings can quickly change.</p>
<p>The college president, Lee Bollinger prefaced Ahmadinejad by saying, &#8220;It should never be thought that merely to listen to ideas we deplore in any way implies our endorsement of those ideas, or the weakness of our resolve to resist those ideas or our naiveté about the very real dangers inherent in such ideas. It is a critical premise of freedom of speech that we do not honor the dishonorable when we open the public forum to their voices.&#8221; He also cited the quotable expression about how free speech is &#8220;an experiment, as all life is an experiment.&#8221; and apologized in advance for any suffering that giving this speaker a public forum would cause.</p>
<p>Before turning to Ahmadinejad he finished   on the subject, &#8220;In the moment, the arguments for free speech will never seem to match the power of the arguments against, but what we must remember is that this is precisely because free speech asks us to exercise extraordinary self-restraint against the very natural but often counterproductive impulses that lead us to retreat from engagement with ideas we dislike and fear. In this lies the genius of the American idea of free speech.&#8221; Bollinger furthered the introduction by condemning the government of Iran for unjust imprisonment, public executions, and other violations of human rights.</p>
<p>I think that the subject of free speech can transcend politics. I think that debate in all forms is usually a good thing and I really think that Columbia&#8217;s prez eloquently expressed this&#8211;His thoughts on freedom of speech were the best I&#8217;ve ever heard in my life.<br />
<a HREF="http://ecology666.blogspot.com/">The Bliggity No Diggity Blog-a-Log </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

